Debian Follow-up, and StumpWMSun Nov 14, 2010
Ok, so remember how I said I added some of the latest Ubuntu repos to my Debian
sources.list just to hit one or two installs?
Don't do that.
For the love of God, don't. Or, at least, remove them from your
sources file afterwards. I was happy enough with the stability of Debian this weekend, so I decided to run my install script1. Bad idea, to put it mildly. I had no idea what the hell I was doing at the time, so I just hit
y RET a whole bunch of times, and in the process fucked up my sytem. I knew I was boned about the time I saw
removing gnome-network-manager removing gnome-desktop removing gnome-tray removing x-server [more bad stuff]
whizz by on the terminal window. When I next restarted, I got a friendly little prompt, and that's it. My data was still intact, but I didn't have a network connection for perhaps obvious reasons, so I
mounted a usb-stick and got the shit I've been working on for the past day or so off, and prepared to reinstall. I don't know nearly enough about Linux innards to attempt surgery at this point.
I had a thought though; my current installation was Debian Lenny, and there was a "testing" version out called Squeeze2. It took a bit of counter-intuitive navigation on the Debian site to get to the [squeeze installer](http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/), but I guess that's reasonable; they want most people to install the "stable" release, not the "testing" or "unstable" ones. So there, I'm typing to you live from Debian Squeeze, and I have to tell you, it's good. The biggest gripes I had from the last post have been addressed; the new version of Gnome plays nice with two monitors out of the box, and the squeeze repos have more recent installs of the programs I use than Ubuntu. Specifically, I get out-of-the-box
apt-get access to
So there. Debian beats Ubuntu from my perspective.
At this point, since I was already ass-deep in installs anyway, putting in StumpWM seemed like a logical conclusion. So I did. And I'm in love. It's Emacs for window management3. I've set up a minimal
.stumpwmrc file like so
;; Psst, Emacs. This is a -*- lisp -*- file. (in-package :stumpwm) (message "Loading rc ...") ;;; Program definitions (defcommand emacs () () (run-or-raise "emacs" '(:class "Emacs"))) (defcommand browser () () (run-or-raise "conkeror" '(:class "Conkeror"))) ;;;Reloading (defcommand reinit () () (run-commands "reload" "loadrc")) ;;;Keybindings (define-key *root-map* (kbd "b") "browser") (define-key *root-map* (kbd "C-q") "quit") (define-key *root-map* (kbd "C-r") "reinit") ;;;Things that happen on StumpWM startup (run-shell-command "/usr/bin/trayer --SetDockType false --transparent true --expand false") (run-shell-command "nm-applet --sm-disable")
just to get everything up and running.
trayer is needed to get the
nm-applet working so I can has internets.
It's occurred to me that, now that my window manager is a Lisp machine, I could hard-wire "web-jumps" into my environment with Firefox. Not sure if it'd be worth giving up the keyboard shortcuts, but I would get HTML5 support, and all of my scripting would be done in Lisp at that point (rather than a JS/Lisp split). I'm really not up for that this weekend, but I'll keep playing with Stump. So far, it's good stuff.
- Which includes things from audio-editing programs to inkscape, to emacs to several languages.↩
- "testing" is in quotes, because by all accounts I've read, it's rock solid by this point.↩
- Just as a note, I've found that any software I could describe as "Emacs for [n]" is something I'd probably like. Sadly, between Emacs, Emacs for the web and Emacs for window management, I get the feeling we're about tapped out now. I like GIMP, but it's not exactly "Emacs for images".↩